Canonical retriangulation and isometry signature¶
The canonical retriangulation is a close relative to the canonical cell decomposition defined by Epstein and Penner. Like the canonical cell decomposition, it is intrinsic to a hyperbolic manifold M and is (up to combinatorial isomorphism relabeling the tetrahedra and vertices) completely determined by the isometry type of a hyperbolic manifold. Unlike the canonical cell decomposition, the canonical retriangulation always conists entirely of tetrahedra which makes it more amenable for many computations by SnapPy.
If the canonical cell decompositon of manifold M has only tetrahedral cells,
we define the canonical retriangulation to be the canonical cell decomposition.
In this case, the canonical retriangulation consists of ideal hyperbolic
tetrahedra and the canonical_retriangulation
method returns a
SnapPy manifold. Example:
sage: M = Manifold("m015")
sage: K = M.canonical_retriangulation(verified = True)
sage: K.has_finite_vertices() # False iff all canonical cells tetrahedral
False
If the canonical cell decomposition has non-tetrahedral cells, we turn it into
a topological triangulation as follows: pick a point (called center) in each
3-cell. “Suspend” each 2-cell (which is an ideal n-gon) between
the centers of the two neighboring 3-cells. These suspensions form a
decomposition of M into topological “diamonds”. Each diamond can be split along
its central axis into n tetrahedra. This introduces finite vertices, thus
the verified_canonical_retriangulation
method returns only a SnapPy
triangulation. Example (canonical cell is a cube):
sage: M = Manifold("m412")
sage: K = M.canonical_retriangulation(verified = True)
sage: K.has_finite_vertices()
True
The canonical retriangulation can be used to certifiably find all isometries of a manifold:
sage: K.isomorphisms_to(K)
[0 -> 1 1 -> 0
[1 0] [1 0]
[0 1] [0 1]
Extends to link,
...
Extends to link]
sage: len(K.isomorphisms_to(K))
8
Recall that the isomorphism signature is a complete invariant of the combinatorial isomorphism type of a triangulation that was defined by Burton. We can compute the isomorphism signature of the canonical retriangulation:
sage: Manifold("m003").canonical_retriangulation(verified = True).triangulation_isosig()
'cPcbbbdxm'
The resulting invariant was called isometry signature by Goerner and, for convenience, can be accessed by:
sage: Manifold("m003").isometry_signature(verified = True)
'cPcbbbdxm'
It is a complete invariant of the isometry type of a hyperbolic manifold. Thus it can be used to easily identify isometric manifolds (here, the last two manifolds have the same isometry signature and thus have to be isomorphic):
sage: Manifold("m003").isometry_signature(verified = True)
'cPcbbbdxm'
sage: Manifold("m004").isometry_signature(verified = True)
'cPcbbbiht'
sage: Manifold("4_1").isometry_signature(verified = True)
'cPcbbbiht'
sage: Manifold("m004").isometry_signature(verified = True) == Manifold("4_1").isometry_signature(verified = True)
True
Other applications of the canonical retriangulation include the detection of 2-bridge knots.
Verifiying the canonical retriangulation¶
- snappy.verify.verified_canonical_retriangulation(M, interval_bits_precs=[53, 212], exact_bits_prec_and_degrees=[(212, 10), (1000, 20), (2000, 20)], verbose=False)¶
Given some triangulation of a cusped (possibly non-orientable) manifold
M
, return its canonical retriangulation. ReturnNone
if it could not certify the result.To compute the canonical retriangulation, it first prepares the manifold (filling all Dehn-filled cusps and trying to find a proto-canonical triangulation). It then tries to certify the canonical triangulation using interval arithmetics. If this fails, it uses snap (using LLL-algorithm) to guess exact representations of the shapes in the shape field and then certifies that it found the proto-canonical triangulation and determines the transparent faces to construct the canonical retriangulation.
The optional arguments are:
interval_bits_precs
: a list of precisions used to try to certify the canonical triangulation using intervals. By default, it first tries to certify using 53 bits precision. If it failed, it tries 212 bits precision next. If it failed again, it moves on to trying exact arithmetics.exact_bits_prec_and_degrees
: a list of pairs (precision, maximal degree) used when the LLL-algorithm is trying to find the defining polynomial of the shape field. Similar tointerval_bits_precs
, each pair is tried until we succeed.verbose
: IfTrue
, print out additional information.
The exact arithmetics can take a long time. To circumvent it, use
exact_bits_prec_and_degrees = None
.More information on the canonical retriangulation can be found in the SnapPea kernel
canonize_part_2.c
and in Section 3.1 of Fominykh, Garoufalidis, Goerner, Tarkaev, Vesnin.Canonical cell decomposition of
m004
has 2 tetrahedral cells:sage: from snappy import Manifold sage: M = Manifold("m004") sage: K = verified_canonical_retriangulation(M) sage: K.has_finite_vertices() False sage: K.num_tetrahedra() 2
Canonical cell decomposition of
m137
is not tetrahedral:sage: M = Manifold("m137") sage: K = verified_canonical_retriangulation(M) sage: K.has_finite_vertices() True sage: K.num_tetrahedra() 18
Canonical cell decomposition of
m412
is a cube and has exactly 8 symmetries:sage: M = Manifold("m412") sage: K = verified_canonical_retriangulation(M) sage: K.has_finite_vertices() True sage: K.num_tetrahedra() 12 sage: len(K.isomorphisms_to(K)) 8
Burton’s example of
x101
andx103
which are actually isometric but SnapPea fails to show so. We certify the canonical retriangulation and find them isomorphic:sage: M = Manifold('x101'); K = verified_canonical_retriangulation(M) sage: N = Manifold('x103'); L = verified_canonical_retriangulation(N) sage: len(K.isomorphisms_to(L)) > 0 True
Avoid potentially expensive exact arithmetics (return
None
because it has non-tetrahedral cells so interval arithmetics can’t certify it):sage: M = Manifold("m412") sage: verified_canonical_retriangulation(M, exact_bits_prec_and_degrees = None)